RadiusDocs turns fragmented medical records, bills, and imaging into citation-backed demand drafts, chronologies, and exhibit packets — in your firm's template, with every fact traceable to the source page. Built for the operating reality of plaintiff-side PI.
Chronology, damages, exhibits, missing-doc flags. Every fact cited.
We've watched too many clinics evaluate us as the wrong kind of software. Let's get that out of the way.
You control the file, the timing, and the output. No black-box demand shop. No "token math" pricing. No waiting days for someone else's draft.
Keep Clio, MyCase, Filevine, or PracticePanther. RadiusDocs integrates and writes structured outputs back — it doesn't try to be your matter management system.
Every fact in every output links back to the exact page and line in the source record. Click any assertion — see the proof. That's the trust posture lawyers actually need.
Every pain below is ranked by frequency in public PI-firm interviews, customer stories, and operational descriptions. We didn't invent these.
Across the strongest public PI-firm evidence, the #1 pain is the same: paralegals and case managers spending entire days re-reading fragmented PDFs before any strategy starts. One litigator publicly called it "tedious and slow." Customer stories cite up to 100 hours saved per case with automation.
Public PI customer stories cite an average of three missing document sets per demand. Providers can legally take up to 30 days (plus a 30-day extension) to fulfill access requests. Missing items depress demand completeness, force resubmissions, and leave money on the table.
Public examples describe 45-day demand backlogs, demands taking 'several months,' and demand teams flipping 150 packets per month under deadline. Workarounds: dedicated demand writers, Word templates, exhibit-building in Adobe.
Chronology work is the spine of causation, damages, and negotiation leverage. Hand-built chronologies, legal-nurse support, sticky-note PDF workflows are still the norm. Public customer story cited a 50% decrease in chronology review time after automation.
Teams re-search the same facts for adjusters, client meetings, depositions, mediation, and trial prep. Customer stories contrast "old paper-file flipping" with instant search; one firm reported 75% faster case review and assignment.
One operator publicly told a vendor they wanted 'not a collection of disconnected tools.' Data gets copied across CasePeer, Litify, Word, Adobe, spreadsheets, intake notes, and demand software. Every copy is a place errors live.
Public quotes from PI litigators, firm operators, and senior attorneys describing what record work feels like today.
[Medical-record review is] tedious and slow.
I want 100% case readiness — I should know what's ready, risky, or missing before the meeting starts.
[Demand work] drives some grads to quit.
No. CaseOS is in-house software — you control the file, the timing, and the output. No black-box demand shop, no waiting days for someone else's draft, no per-page "token math."
Yes. As it ingests records, CaseOS flags missing bills, missing imaging, and treatment gaps — public PI accounts cite an average of three missing document sets per demand, and one missing bill can quietly lower a recovery.
It integrates with your case-management tools and exports .docx in your firm's format. CaseOS is a production layer that writes structured outputs back — not another disconnected tab.
Every fact links to the exact source page and line. Click any assertion to see the record — the draft is built for review and sign-off, not blind trust.
One 15-minute demo with a real human. Bring a record you actually struggled with — we'll show you exactly what RadiusDocs would produce.
Start Your Free Trial