Sign In Start Free Trial
For Independent Medical Examiners & Expert Reviewers

Spend expert time on analysis. Not on sorting PDFs.

RadiusDocs reads the full record set before you do — chronology, diagnoses, providers, procedures, gaps, and missing-record flags, all citation-backed. You walk into the exam already knowing the case. You write opinion, not narrative summary.

Start Your Free Trial See a Sample IME Draft

IME Pre-Exam Brief — 1,247 pages reviewed

Chronology, gaps, missing records, key citations. Ready before the visit.

📑
Page-cited
⚠️
Gap flags
🔒
HIPAA

Here's what RadiusDocs isn't.

We've watched too many clinics evaluate us as the wrong kind of software. Let's get that out of the way.

Not an EMR or scribe.

We work on the records after they exist. Your encounter capture, dictation, and clinic workflow stay exactly as they are.

Not forming the opinion.

RadiusDocs assembles the cited factual record. You apply medical judgment — the opinion stays yours, fully defensible, fully attributable.

Not a billing or scheduling tool.

Claim submission, billing, scheduling, and report fulfillment stay in the systems you already use.

Four jobs RadiusDocs does for IME and expert reviewers.

Sourced from public IME-physician threads and expert-witness commentary.

Pre-exam record review

Stop spending your nights indexing PDFs before the exam.

IME and expert-review work pays for opinion and examination — not for the unpaid hours of indexing thousands of pages of outside records, imaging reports, and prior treaters before you can form a defensible view.

Public expert-review threads describe pre-exam record review as the largest unpaid cost of IME and forensic work.
RadiusDocs delivers a structured, page-cited chronology before you see the patient — diagnoses, providers, procedures, timelines, gaps. You spend the visit examining, not reading.
Defensibility under deposition

Every opinion linked to the exact page it came from.

Depositions punish vague opinions. Expert-witness discussions repeatedly stress that opinions need evidence and page support. AI-generated drafts without citations are now a documented liability — lawyers have been reprimanded for passing off hallucinated citations.

IME discussion threads: "It's not a job where you can BS for long, you have to have evidence."
Line-level citations in every output — click any fact and see the exact page and line in the source record. The trust posture deposition requires.
Missing records & gaps

Spot the missing record before opposing counsel does.

IME and forensic reviewers regularly receive incomplete packets: missing imaging, omitted ER records, prior treaters left out, illegible scanned pages. Manually catching what's missing is slow and error-prone.

Medical-board guidance (multiple states): records should include outside provider records when those records informed treatment decisions.
RadiusDocs flags treatment-gap patterns and missing-record categories as it builds the chronology — surface holes before the opinion goes out, not after.
Stuck between parties

Coordinating between attorneys, insurers, and patients — without re-reading the chart.

IME physicians sit between plaintiff attorneys, defense, payers, and patients. Each side requests different cuts of the same record set — and each cut today means re-reading the file in a new lens.

Public threads from pain physicians describe being pulled between lawyers, insurers, and patients with repeated record review requests.
One ingested record set, many cited outputs — IME report, supplemental opinion, deposition prep packet, all from the same source.

What IME and expert-review physicians actually say.

Public quotes from physicians doing forensic, expert, and IME work.

It's not a job where you can BS for long, you have to have evidence.
— SpineBound, Student Doctor Network (IME discussion)
We've already seen lawyers get reprimanded for passing off bogus citations hallucinated by AI.
— Therapist4Chnge, Student Doctor Network
Personal injury attorneys try to dictate how a physician practices.
— Pain physician, Student Doctor Network

Works With Your Existing Stack

Questions you’re probably asking

Does CaseOS form the opinion for me?

No. It assembles the cited factual record — chronology, findings, gaps. The medical opinion stays yours and fully attributable.

Will it hold up under cross-examination?

Every factual statement links to the exact page it came from, so you can answer "where does it say that?" in seconds — the trust posture deposition demands.

Is it an EMR or billing tool?

No. CaseOS works on the records after they exist. Your encounter capture, dictation, billing, and report fulfillment stay in the systems you already use.

How soon before the exam can I have a brief?

A structured, page-cited pre-exam brief is ready in minutes — you walk into the exam already knowing the case.

Walk into the next exam already knowing the case.

One 15-minute demo with a real human. Bring a record set you actually struggled with — we'll show you the pre-exam brief RadiusDocs would produce.

Start Your Free Trial
HIPAA-compliant Results in minutes 7-day free trial